PCN-805 Week 3 Research Review 1

Answer of PCN-805 Week 3 Research Review 1 for $15 Only

cheerful family having together with their dog

PCN-805 Week 3 Research Review 1
 
In the process of becoming a doctoral researcher, it is necessary to develop the ability to organize and synthesize the related extant literature. By developing a narrative that highlights connections and progressions among the individual sources, the process of reviewing the literature serves as a tool to aid the researcher in identifying a problem or a research gap in a given field. In this assignment, you will conduct an abbreviated review of the literature related to topics in the first part of this course.

General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

·         This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

·         Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center. 

·         Refer to Chapters 2-4 of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.) for specific guidelines related to doctoral level writing. These chapters contain essential information on manuscript structure and content, clear and concise writing, and academic grammar and usage.

·         This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included. Sources must be published within three years of the present day or be classical or seminal works.

·         You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Directions:
Write an abridged, narrative review of the literature (1,750-2,000 words) on the ethics and organizational context of consultation and collaboration. Use sources that are no more than three years old or those that are classical or seminal works. Include the following in your review:

  1.     A chronological narrative that summarizes, connects, and synthesizes at least five resources that address ethics in consultation and collaboration. Highlight similarities, differences, and progressions in thought across the sources and over time. 
  2.     A chronological narrative that summarizes, connects, and synthesizes at least five resources that address the organizational context of consultation and collaboration. Highlight similarities, differences, and progressions in thought across the sources and over time. 
  3.     A summary of the key ideas that can be inferred from each set of sources when taken as a whole. What is compelling about these sources? What do these sources mean for the behavioral health consulting field?
  4.     A statement of one or more identified gaps in the sets of sources. What is missing that should be noted? What questions remain after reading and reflecting on these sources?

Price of Answer: Just US$15 only

Buy Now
The safe, easier way to pay

Need Assistance…??  email us at [email protected].

If you need any type of help regarding Homework, Assignments, Projects, Case study, Essay writing, or anything else just email us at [email protected].  We will get back to you ASAP. Do not forget to maintain the time frame you need your work to be done.