HLT 520 Topic 3 DQ 2

HLT 520 Topic 3 DQ 2

HLT 520 Topic 3 DQ 2 for $7 Only
Max Points: 5.0

What do you see as the pros and cons of obtaining fair market value analyses on the compensation paid to physicians, especially when the market rates are benchmarked against national standards? How could this information be used in negotiating rates with physicians?

Price of Answer: Just US$7 only

Buy Now

Need Assistance…??  email us at [email protected].

If you need any type of help regarding Homework, Assignments, Projects, Case study, Essay writing or anything else then just email us at [email protected]solvemyquestion.com.  We will get back to you ASAP. Do not forget to maintain the time frame you need your work to be done.

HLT540 Week 6 Assignment t-Test for Two Samples

HLT-540 Week 6 Assignment t-Test for Two Samples for $14 Only
Max Points: 40

HLT540 Week 6 Assignment

Details:

A drug company is measuring levels of oxygenation in patients after receiving a test medication. As the researcher, you are interested in whether Group I, which received the medication, has the same oxygenation levels as Group II, which did not.

Group 1: 2,3,3,4,4,7,8,9
Group 2: 1,2,2,3,4,4,5,5,6,8
Use Excel to run a t-test for two samples, assuming equal variances, with an alpha value of 0.05. Run the t-test and note:

Are you doing a one-tailed test or a two-tailed test (Excel will give you both)?
What is the probability that Group I is different from Group 2, using the p value? Is it significant against the benchmark of p < .05?
While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Price of Answer: Just US$14 only
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=Q4F54WN5JXLYW
Need Assistance…??  email us at [email protected].
If you need any type of help regarding Homework, Assignments, Projects, Case study, Essay writing or anything else then just email us at [email protected]solvemyquestion.com.  We will get back to you ASAP. Do not forget to maintain the time frame you need your work to be done.

HLT 520 Topic 8 DQ 1

HLT 520 Topic 8 DQ 1 for $5 OnlyHLT 520 Topic 8 DQ 1

Max Points: 5.0

A baby is born with anencephaly, or absence of the entire brain above the brainstem. The brainstem is intact, which means that the baby can breathe and have a heartbeat and blood pressure, but there is no chance for any human brain function or cognition, due to this birth defect. The health care team begins to educate the mother, since children with this deficit generally die shortly after birth. However, the mother is devoutly religious, and her minister has told her that if she prays hard enough to God, that God will work a miracle and her baby’s brain will heal itself. She is insistent that all possible care be given to her baby, including a months-long stay in the ICU, constant care by a caregiver, regular brain scans, and other expensive modalities. The hospital, finding her adamant, asks the court for guardianship of the baby, with the medical plan to provide only maintenance care with no life-prolonging techniques until the baby dies. What are the ethical issues are involved? How do the principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmalfeasance, and justice manifest themselves? If you were called as an ethical consultant, what would you do/recommend?

Price of Answer: Just US$7 only

Buy Now

Need Assistance…??  email us at [email protected].

If you need any type of help regarding Homework, Assignments, Projects, Case study, Essay writing or anything else then just email us at [email protected]solvemyquestion.com.  We will get back to you ASAP. Do not forget to maintain the time frame you need your work to be done.

HLT 490v Week 3 Assignment Proposed Solution, Implementation, and Evaluation

HLT 490v Week 3 Assignment Proposed Solution, Implementation, and Evaluation for $19 Only

HLT-490v Week 3 Assignment Proposed Solution, Implementation, and Evaluation

Details:

The final capstone project is a culmination of the written research-based assignments completed throughout the course. Each written assignment contributes to the final Evidenced-Based Proposal paper. This is the third written assignment.

Proposal

Describe your proposed solution (100-250 words).

Preparing an Implementation Plan

Develop an implementation plan (1,000-1,500 words). The elements that should be included in your plan are listed below:

  • Method of obtaining necessary approval(s) and securing support from your organization’s leadership and fellow staff.
  • Description of current problem, issue, or deficit requiring a change. If you are proposing a change in current policy, process, or procedure when delivering patient care, describe first the current policy, process, or procedure as a baseline for comparison.
  • Detailed explanation of proposed solution (new policy, process, procedure, or education to address the problem/deficit).
  • Rationale for selecting proposed solution.
  • Evidence from your review of literature in Topic 2 to support your proposed solution and reason for change.
  • Description of implementation logistics. (When and how will the change be integrated into the current organizational structure, culture, and workflow? Who will be responsible for initiating the change, educating staff, and overseeing the implementation process?)
  • Resources required for implementation: staff; educational materials (pamphlets, handouts, posters, and PowerPoint presentations); assessment tools (questionnaires, surveys, pre- and post-tests to assess knowledge of participants at baseline and after intervention); technology (technological or software needs); funds (cost of educating staff, printing or producing educational materials, gathering and analyzing data before, during, and following implementation); and staff to initiate, oversee, and evaluate change.

Evaluation Plan

Prepare an evaluation plan (500-750 words) supported by your critical appraisal of the literature.

  • Discuss methods to evaluate the effectiveness of your proposed solution.
  • Describe what your projected outcomes will be and what variables will be assessed.

General Requirements

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Rubric

Proposed Solution, Implementation, and Evaluation

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content

25.0 %

Description of Solution
Problem is poorly described or not described; no relevance to patient care or quality of practice given; no correlated references.
Solution is presented such that the reader cannot clearly see its correlation to or potential for impact on the problem; is vague or incomplete. Solution does not seem to be supported by the evidence that was previously submitted.
Solution is presented such that the reader can see its correlation to the problem and how it might have the proposed impact. Solution is supported by the previously submitted evidence.
Solution is presented such that the reader understands how it will likely have a positive impact. Solution is supported by the previously submitted evidence.
Solution is presented such that the reader is convinced it is the best choice and will have the greatest impact. Solution is supported by the previously submitted evidence.

25.0 %Description of Implementation Plan: Sequence of Seven Events of Preparation as Specified in the Assignment
Plan lacks identification of many necessary events, or they are poorly stated; sequence of events presented in the plan lacks logical order. Plan does not identify many necessary resources.
Plan lacks identification of some necessary events; sequence of events presented in the plan lacks some logical order; plan is somewhat vague or incomplete. Plan does not identify some necessary resources.
Plan clearly outlines necessary events in a logical sequence. Minimal acceptable details are provided and are mostly applicable to the subject. Plan identifies basic necessary resources.
Plan outlines in detail all of the necessary events in a logical sequence. Plan considers appropriate entities and organizations that must be included. Plan thoroughly identifies necessary resources.
Plan outlines in detail all of the necessary events in a logical sequence. Plan considers appropriate entities and organizations that must be included. Plan considers hurdles to implementation and alternative strategies to implementation. Plan thoroughly identifies all necessary resources.

25.0 %Description of Evaluation Plan, Including Evaluation Methods, Variables to Be Assessed, and Projected Outcomes
Plan does not explain how the project will be evaluated. Anticipated outcomes are not identified or well defined.
Plan does not clearly explain how the project will be evaluated. Anticipated outcomes are identified but weakly defined. Plan is somewhat vague or incomplete.
Plan provides basic explanation of how the project will be evaluated as well as anticipated outcomes. Minimal acceptable details are provided and are mostly applicable to the subject.
Plan explains in detail how the project will be evaluated as well as clearly stating anticipated outcomes.
Plan explains in detail how all aspects of the project will be evaluated and its anticipated outcomes. Further, plan describes possible outcomes that may not be directly related to the initial intent of the project.

5.0 %Research Sources (Sources are appropriate, relevant, etc. Also, sources meet assignment quantity and type specifications, including evidence-based resources.)
Sources are not used or cited as required in the assignment instructions. Uses noncredible sources.
Source relevance is vague or inconsistent. Does not include references from appropriate sources (e.g., evidenced-based resources).
Source relevance is mostly applicable and appropriate. Includes references from appropriate sources (e.g., evidenced-based resources).
Source relevance is applicable and appropriate in all instances. Includes references from appropriate sources (e.g., evidenced-based resources).
Source relevance is applicable and appropriate in all instances as well as sparking interest in the reader to pursue further investigation. Includes references from appropriate sources (e.g., evidenced-based resources).

20.0 %Presentation and Format Guidelines

10.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion.
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner.

20.0 %Presentation and Format Guidelines

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Does not meet minimum assigned length; numerous errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar; inappropriate in three or more of the following: appearance of document (font size or style, use of white space, use of headings), tone, word choice, or sentence structure (incomplete sentences; run-on sentences; incorrect subject-verb agreement, etc.).
Does not meet minimum assigned length; repeated specific types of errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar (e.g., paper consistently has subject-verb disagreement); inappropriate in two of the following: appearance of document (font size or style, use of white space, use of headings), tone, word choice, or sentence structure.
Meets assigned length criteria; occasional errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar; inappropriate in one of the following: appearance of document (font size or style, use of white space, use of headings), tone, word choice, or sentence structure.
Meets assigned length criteria; few errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar; appropriate in all of the following: appearance of document (font size or style, use of white space, use of headings), tone, word choice, or sentence structure.
Meets assigned length criteria; no major errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar; professional appearance of document (font size or style, use of white space, use of headings), professional tone, word choice and sentence structure; uses headings to organize paper.

20.0 %Presentation and Format Guidelines

5.0 %Title Page and Research Documentation (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style, and meeting assignment requirements.)
No title page; no reference section; more than one requested section is missing; no correctly cited references within the body of the paper.
Title page incomplete or inaccurate; one requested section is missing; reference section includes sources, many citation errors; references within the body of the paper included, but many citation errors.
More than one of the following are identified: title page has minor errors; section differentiation is not clear; reference section includes sources, not consistently cited correctly; references included within the body of the paper, some citation errors.
One of the following is identified: title page has minor errors; section differentiation is not clear; reference section includes sources, not consistently cited correctly; references included within the body of the paper, some citation errors.
Title page complete; all requested sections are included; reference section includes correctly cited sources; in-text citations are included and correctly cited.

Price of Answer: Just US$19 only

Buy Now

Need Assistance…??  email us at [email protected].

If you need any type of help regarding Homework, Assignments, Projects, Case study, Essay writing or anything else then just email us at [email protected]solvemyquestion.com.  We will get back to you ASAP. Do not forget to maintain the time frame you need your work to be done.

HLT 600 Public Health Policy Full Course

HLT 600 Public Health Policy Full Course in $166 Only

HLT 600 Week 1  discussion 1

A hallmark of President Barack Obama’s administration has been the introduction of his Affordable Health Care Act What are the main goals of the Affordable Health Care Act? Provide an argument for or against its implementation Make sure to provide evidence to support your position Respond to two other peers with differing opinions and identify points that you feel may sway you to reconsider your opinion If you do not find points that may make you reconsider, describe why you disagree with the peer’s response One-sentence posts or peer responses are not appropriate and will not receive full credit

HLT 600 Week 1  discussion 2

Given the policy-making process, why is the composition of Congress important, and how does it influence the creation of health care policy? Use a specific example to demonstrate your point within your answer Respond to two other peers and provide additional insight and/or constructive comments One-sentence posts or peer responses are not appropriate and will not receive full credit